They Invented What? (No. 229)
U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 20080124431: Hollow hot dog.
1. A food product comprising: a generally cylindrical hot dog with a hollow core formed therein.
Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog
About
Anticipate This!™ (AT!) is a patent and trademark law blog providing thought-provoking commentary . . . with a dash of irreverent humor.
A Top 20 Patent Blog
Pages
- About the Author
- Anticipate What?
- Disclaimer & Terms of Use
- Practitioner & Inventor Resources
- They Invented What?
AT! Twitter
- lnkd.in/gXZQ_X4 25 minutes ago
- lnkd.in/grbwY7e 5 hours ago
- lnkd.in/gkpJng6 1 day ago
- lnkd.in/gkB8kbM 3 days ago
- RT @patentbuddy: Trademark Assignment Dataset Released by the USPTO: uspto.gov/learning-and-r… 3 days ago
AT! by E-mail
Contact AT!
Categories
- General Commentary (292)
- Litigation Commentary (30)
- Opinion Commentary (80)
- Practice Commentary (110)
- Science and Technology (33)
- Statute Commentary (16)
- They Invented What? (240)
Recent Posts
- They Invented What? (No. 59)
- USPTO Director Andrei Iancu on Priorities, Patent System Challenges.
- They Invented What? (No. 58)
- Presenting on Intellectual Property Law at Ashland University on August 2, 2018.
- They Invented What? (No. 57)
- Presenting on Intellectual Property Law at Ashland University on August 2, 2018.
- They Invented What? (No. 56)
- New “Ribbon Copy” Style for U.S. Letters Patent.
Recent Comments
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 59)
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 58)
- Jake Ward on Presenting on Intellectual Property Law at Ashland University on August 2, 2018.
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 57)
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 56)
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 55)
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 54)
- Jake Ward on They Invented What? (No. 53)
Archives
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
Top Posts
- New "Ribbon Copy" Style for U.S. Letters Patent.
- What is the Eighth Identifier?
- About the Author
- Dippin' Dots, Inc., et al. v. Mosey, et al. v. Esty, Jr., et al.
- They Invented What? (No. 59)
- They Invented What? (No. 228)
- They Invented What? (No. 58)
- The Evolution of MPEP 2143 - Prima Facie Case of Obviousness.
Top Clicks
- None
Blog Stats
- 345,173 hits and counting
2 comments