U.S. Patent No. 4,833,729: Shark protector suit.
JW Note: Hat tip to the “Creepy IP Series” at the United States Patent and Trademark Office for bringing this one to our attention.
1. A suit for protecting its wearer from attack by sharks comprising:
rubber suit means for substantially completely covering the wearer’s body;
closed helmet means including a face mask attached to the suit means for substantially completely covering the wearer’s head;
glove means attached to the suit means for substantially completely covering the wearer’s hands;
shoe means attached to the suit means for substantially completely covering the wearer’s feet;
elongated spike means for repelling sharks extending outwardly from the suit means and helmet means; and rigid plate means attached to an outer surface of the suit for protecting the wearer.
U.S. Patent No. 7,104,865: Apparatus for cat’s cradle game.
JW Note: This TIW? should be filed under “Creepy Kid’s Toys”.
What is claimed is:
1. A self-play cat’s cradle toy that permits a single user as a first player to manipulate a string loop, comprising: a base; a first arm supported in a first position relative to the base; a second arm moveably supported relative to the base; a set of digits supported by each of the first and second arms; a resiliently-biased, manual actuator positioned along the base and physically coupled to the second arm to effect movement of the second arm toward the first position in response to pressure on the actuator, the manual actuator resiliently returning to a rest position in response to the restoring force of the bias; and a surface of at least a portion of the digits in the set of digits being configured to resist release of the string loop as the second arm is moved away from the first position in order to bring the string loop into a taut condition, wherein the first and second arms are surrogates for a second player; and wherein the base, arms, actuator and surface cooperate as a device to permit the single user to self-play cat’s cradle.
U.S. Patent No. 6,206,000: Canine scuba diving apparatus.
1. An underwater self-contained breathing apparatus for use by a canine, comprising:
a transparent rigid helmet having a skirted opening for the wearer’s neck, the helmet being sufficiently large to avoid contact with the face or nose of the canine user;
a regulator for supplying a breathable gas attached to the helmet;
a means of adjusting a position of a demand valve in the regulator to pressurize the helmet at no less than ambient pressure;
a harness attached to the helmet;
means for fastening the harness around the wearer’s torso; and
one or more pockets in the harness for receiving ballast weights.
U.S. Patent No. 230,067: Method of precipitating rain falls.
JW Note: It’s so crazy, it might just work!
The mode herein described of producing rain-fall, said mode consisting in conveying and exploding torpedoes or other explosive agents within the cloud-realm, substantially as described.
U.S. Patent No. 8,209,891: Memorial marker.
JW Note: Memorial Day in the United States is a day of remembering the men and women who died while serving in the United States Armed Forces. We wish all of our readers a safe and happy Memorial Day 2013.
What is claimed is:
1. A memorial marker, comprising: a grave marker; a base placed on the grave marker, the base including a spring element coupled thereto and affixing the base to the grave marker; and a rod having a first end and a second end, the rod coupled to the base at the first end and disposed in a substantially upright position, the second end of the rod having an ornament coupled thereto.
The USPTO issued the following press release today, concerning the After Final Consideration (AFC) pilot program, which allows Examiners and Patent Applicants additional opportunities to reach agreement when the status of an outstanding Office Action has been made “final”.
JW Note: Our experience with the initial pilot program was positive, and we are pleased to see the USPTO further developing the program. Any additional opportunity to reach agreement prior to filing costly appeals or requests for continued examination (RCE) is generally good for patent applicants.
After Final Consideration Pilot 2.0
Using information gathered from the After Final Consideration Pilot (AFCP), as well as input from stakeholders and examiners obtained through the RCE outreach initiative, the USPTO will launch the After Final Consideration Pilot 2.0 (AFCP 2.0) on May 19, 2013. Designed to be more efficient and effective than the AFCP, AFCP 2.0 will be part of the USPTO’s on-going efforts towards compact prosecution and increased collaboration between examiners and stakeholders.
“Compact prosecution remains one of our top goals,” said Teresa Stanek Rea, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the USPTO. “As with the original AFCP pilot, the new AFCP 2.0 pilot allows additional flexibility for applicants and examiners to work together and provides even greater opportunity for communication after final than the original pilot.”
Like AFCP, AFCP 2.0 authorizes additional time for examiners to search and/or consider responses after final rejection. Under AFCP 2.0, examiners will also use the additional time to schedule and conduct an interview to discuss the results of their search and/or consideration with you, if your response does not place the application in condition for allowance. In this way, you will benefit from the additional search and consideration afforded by the pilot, even when the results do not lead to allowance.
In addition, the procedure for obtaining consideration under AFCP 2.0 has been revised. The revised procedure focuses the pilot on review of proposed claim amendments and allows the USPTO to better evaluate the pilot.
To be eligible for consideration under AFCP 2.0, you must file a response under 37 CFR §1.116, which includes a request for consideration under the pilot and an amendment to at least one independent claim that does not broaden the scope of the independent claim in any aspect. Please see the notice published in the Federal Register at 78 Fed. Reg. 29117 for a complete description of how to request consideration under AFCP 2.0. As was the case with the AFCP, examiners will continue to use their professional judgment to decide whether the response can be fully considered under AFCP 2.0. This will include determining whether any additional search is required and can be completed within the allotted time, in order to determine whether the application can be allowed.
As always, the option to request an interview with the examiner, consistent with MPEP 713, is available to you irrespective of whether the submission was considered under AFCP 2.0.
If you are considering filing a response to a final rejection under 37 CFR 1.116 that you believe will lead to allowance of your application with only limited further searching and/or consideration by the examiner, you should consider requesting consideration of the response under AFCP 2.0.
AFCP 2.0 is scheduled to run through September 30, 2013, i.e., any request to consider a response after final rejection under AFCP 2.0 must be filed on or after May 19, 2013, and on or before September 30, 2013. AFCP, which began on March 25, 2012, will terminate on May 18, 2013.
Click here for guidance related to consideration of responses.